Architecture Firm Succession Planning

Architecture Firm Succession Planning


>>Enoch: This is Episode 56.>>Voiceover: This is the Business of Architecture.
[music]>>Voiceover: Do it anyway. Welcome to the
Business of Architecture podcast. Helping architects conquer the world. Here’s your
host, Enoch Sears.>>Enoch: Welcome back, Architect Nation,
this is your host Enoch Bartlett Sears and this is the show where we talk about running
a great architecture firm so that we can do what we set out to do when we started school,
which is make the world a better place and do good design. This show is brought to you by the Business
of Architecture conference where you’ll be able to learn everything you ever wanted
to know about starting an architecture firm, marketing a firm, and finding more clients. Today, I’m happy to welcome back to the
show Lisa Henry. She’s a Principal of Greenway Group. She helps architecture firms improve
their business performance. So, Lisa, welcome back to the show.>>Lisa: Thanks, Enoch. Great to be with you.>>Enoch: Now, last week we ended up, just
kind of on the tail end, talking a little bit about firm succession planning. One thing
that comes to mind when I think about this is you have two scenarios: You have sole practitioners
who are thinking about winding down their firm or “What’s going to happen when I
retire?” Then, you have other firms that have other people who are a part of it and
there is some sort of ownership transition. Could we talk first about sole practitioners,
people who are looking for an exit strategy for their firms? Do you have any advice or
strategies for dealing with that kind of scenario?>>Lisa: Oh, absolutely. This is really a
business issue that we’ve been seeing so much more of in the last several years. The
goal of ownership transition is to keep the firm intact. You know, you start a firm and
you want to keep it operating smoothly in the future whether there is an occasion for
change or not such as, you know, somebody retired or something happened, you want the
firm to continue on. So, the idea of keeping the firm transition
planning up front, you can’t start that early enough. You don’t want to wait until
it’s too late. So, the idea of keeping the firm intact during an ownership transition
is just, I think, the first point of the purpose behind a transition plan. There are firms that have just simply waited.
There’s a firm that we worked with in a… It was a second generation firm. It had three
Principals. They, for years, promised to sell their shares to their top employees, but they
put it off. They didn’t have that conversation. Then, the key designers who have the client
relationship said, “We want a reasonable amount of this firm or else we’re going
to cross over and form our own company.” They really created a lot of turmoil because
they were going to leave the firm and the relationships with the Principals were really
badly torn. They were not able to put that back together. Six months of low productivity and profitability
resulted from this lack of transition planning. The firm put itself in peril because they
had their key people essentially walk out the door, and that’s not any place that
a firm needs to see itself. If they had started their transition planning
a few years earlier, they would never have put themselves in that position. It’s really
an owner’s responsibility to address this.>>Enoch: Why do you think it’s so difficult
or so uncommon to have a good transition plan in place?>>Lisa: Well, I think it’s all about people.
Current owners of firms just can’t bear to let it go. They, emotionally, want to still
be the ones, kind of, running it. That’s like a big one. Another reason why we see transitions fail
is the next generation of leadership just simply hasn’t been prepared. They haven’t
been given the opportunity to develop their leadership skills, even business management
skills. They don’t have an understanding of the business aspects of running the firm. You know, for all the great design education
we provide students, there is not a lot of business education that goes along with that.
That is a real challenge for emerging practitioners who really are a lot more independent thinking.
They’re more impatient about wanting the responsibility. For them to have some educational preparation
for leadership, it’s incumbent upon the leader of the firm to give it to them. That’s
honestly how I feel about it. Okay, students don’t necessarily get the business education,
but when they enter in to the firm, and they aspire to stay with the firm– If a path
of ownership is made open to them, they’ll stay and they will be the ones to take this
in to the next phase. The other reason why a lot of transitions
don’t work out, Enoch, is the potential people who might be able to take it on, who
have the leadership skills, just can’t afford to buy in to the firm. Because there is a
financial commitment that has to be made as a firm is going to transition. If the firm
hasn’t been funding this transition over a period of time, these younger generation
employees just aren’t going to have the independent resources to buy the firm.>>Enoch: When you say “funding it over
time” how does that look? What does that mean?>>Lisa: Funding it over time? What that means
is that there is a way that’s been identified for an employee who’s been identified as
a leader to buy in to the firm over time. For example, an owner will say “You’re
the one that I want to have a partnership interest in the firm. That will mean you have
to pay X dollars in equity.” Now, does that have to be written as a $50,000 check this
year? No. It can be written as an earn-out as
a proportion of that equity interest over
time so that it becomes manageable for that person. It’s not complicated. All it does is take
time. If you have someone coming in to the firm and you’re going to transition it the
following year, they just simply aren’t going to have enough time to come up with
that kind of money as opposed to a ten-year transition plan. There’s plenty of time
for that person, by virtue of the fact that they’re working in the firm, to pay in to
the equity position that’s been offered to them.>>Enoch: So, might there be a separate equity
fund set aside that just then gets funded from the person’s salary?>>Lisa: Yes. Well, depending on how they
choose to do it, absolutely. Yes.>>Enoch: Okay. Should that junior person
decide to leave the firm, what then happens to the equity stake that they contributed
to?>>Lisa: Oh. Well, there are programs in place.
There are ways that it can be structured so that person isn’t going to lose equity.
It depends on how it’s structured. There are so many ways these things can be structured,
Enoch, but I think simplistically saying that there would be an agreed upon pay out if the
person ends up leaving. I’ll tell you, if the person ends up leaving,
and I know life happens that they do, that’s really the [Inaudible] of this whole model
because you don’t want the person to leave. The point is when you tap someone to be a
partner they really want to stick around. This is part of it. At the end of the year,
as the profitability of the firm is identified, they’re going to get a piece of that. They
get a proportion of the profits. You’ve heard the term “golden handcuffs.”
Eventually, that’s really what is built. I mean, the equity is built to the point that
that kind of engagement and people wanting to stay is because a real financial reason
to do so exists.>>Enoch: Got it.>>Lisa: Yeah.>>Enoch: So, in terms of from culture and
getting someone to stay, what are some things or suggestions that you would give to help
that happen? What are some things that a firm could do to make sure that people do stay?>>Lisa: Again, primarily if we’re talking
about firm leadership, having ownership in the firm is an absolute. That is a key. You
just can’t blame people for wanting to stay with a company or wanting to leave a company
if they don’t have a piece of it. They’re more likely to be more loyal to their own
careers in that case. But, once they have equity in the firm, they start to transfer
to that to- they tie their destiny more to the firm itself. That’s a real key piece. The other key piece you mentioned was the
firm culture. What is the firm culture? Is it inclusive? Is it open and accepting of
that new leadership? Or is the firm a command and control, you know, ran by one person?
I think those firms are going to have more and more difficulty. If a firm is identified with one individual,
having that firm be able to transition effectively is going to be more of a challenge. There
are myriad of examples of some fantastic design firms that, literally, close their doors because
the firm structure and the firm, itself, the reputation is tied up with one person. That
may be fine for that one person, but once that person makes the decision to retire,
or leave, or something worse, that’s the end of the firm. I don’t know why, but to
me that’s just real… That’s too bad. I just think that’s terrible that that is
allowed to happen because some of these firms have dynamic project work under their belt,
great reputation and that it all resides with one Principal. That’s tough. There’s no
need for it, I don’t think, but, again, this is a question of firm culture. If that’s
how the firm operates where it does, in fact, reside with one guy or one person, then you
can see that there’s a real difference in the firm culture as a result of that.>>Enoch: Yes. Let’s talk about sole practitioners,
if we may, Lisa. Say, there’s a sole practitioner or there’s no bench, there’s no line up
in terms of leadership at the firm. It’s a smaller firm. So, let’s say this particular firm or person
is about ten to five years away from when they want to retire. What are the things that
they need to be thinking about right now so that they’re not crunched up against that
deadline without anyone to pass the torch to?>>Lisa: Well, they need to be thinking about
who and how they could open it up so that they are able to identify individuals. Ideally,
transitions can occur from the inside, but firms also transition to people on the outside.
They end up being sold. But, a firm that is looking to… A sole practitioner
who wants to keep the life of the firm going needs to consider how he’s going to prepare.
Ten years is great. Five years is, you know, not as great, but it can certainly be done
in five years. Preparing one’s successor is part of an owner’s leadership responsibility. If they do have talented people working for
them, they need to identify what are those skill sets that those individuals have. Create
some kind of a transition plan, a leadership development plan with that person, and expressly
articulate that to that person so that it’s not a mystery – that they know that they’re
on that track. The owner, sole practitioner, needs to not
look… They don’t necessarily have to look at people who have the exact same skill sets
as they do. There are a lot of new leaders that may be at the firm that have great skills.
They might not duplicate the current owner’s skills, but they do have strengths around
professional practice in marketing particularly. That person might just be tapped for a potential
transition role because they do have skills that compliment the rest of the team, compliment
the owner, but they’re not necessarily duplicating the owner’s skills.>>Enoch: Okay.>>Lisa: Yeah. It’s just keeping your finger
on the pulse of the people that work for you.>>Enoch: Okay. Just speaking about the sole
practitioners, based upon what you just said, I’m seeing two alternatives. The first one,
they’ve set aside money for retirement and they go in to retirement and they earn money
off their retirement. Maybe they do some projects here and there to pay the bills.>>Lisa: Oh, yeah.>>Enoch: The other one is they, ten years
out, they start looking for a talented person with leadership potential, and try to get
them in to position to carry on the firm.>>Lisa: Correct.>>Enoch: Now, with that second scenario,
what are some ways of structuring that in terms of buy-out? Let’s give our listeners
some specifics here in terms of some ideas of how you’ve seen this work. How can a
buy-out be structured fairly and what kind of revenue can a retiring Principal expect?>>Lisa: Okay. When an owner has identified
a potential leadership partner that’s coming up, you know, the next generation leader,
they really need to set up the financial issues in terms of really making it realistic that
they set small increments for that person to buy in over time. It would behoove them
not to wait until the last moment and then, you know, come up with a big number that is
just not going to be possible. So, that’s why early planning becomes a real key element
in that because you can set the increments, the financial increments, small enough to
make it realistic. They absolutely need to get payment directly.
They can’t give it away. That’s just not going to get the… This is all about skin
in the game, Enoch, and having the people engaged. They say, give it away. It just isn’t valued.
That’s just really true. Then, having, you know, some way of valuing a firm really does
become a part of the conversation. Most owners have placed a value on the firm that may be…
They’re proud of it. They might be unrealistic about the value, but you’ve got to be looking
at how the firm is going to be valued. Make it realistic, and keep the sale of the firm
and its valuation as simple as possible. A lot of firms use book value, which is basically
coming right off of their balance sheet. These are the financial steps that need to be taken.
They need to set increments over time, small enough so that people, their designated leaders,
can plug in to this process, and they need to have a price established for those increments
and keep it very simple.>>Enoch: Okay. Lisa, I’d like to transition
over and talk about a subject that you’re passionate about which is using design to
change the world for the better and how architects can apply this to their work. Can you tell
me a little bit about your thoughts about how design can actually impact the world?>>Lisa: Yes, of course. I would love to.
I think that in all of our hearts, as designers, we all know this. We all know the power of
design to transform communities, to transform lives. It was Winston Churchill – a guy
that I read. I just love historical figures. Winston Churchill said, “First we shape
our buildings, and then they shape us.” I think that is just so true. The effect that the built environment has
on people, it just cannot be overstated. Buildings are the evidence of our culture. They are
what we leave behind and informing next generations of what we value, what is important to us,
and why is expressed in the buildings that we build. Designers as leaders demonstrate the value
that good design can have on the human experience. We know that we’re not only designers of
environment, but we’re designers of situations. We design organizations, and relationships. The design professions, I believe, will increasingly
be the headlines of the future because it’s such a powerful… It determines human behavior.
Businesses, I believe, need to have more design perspective brought in to their organizations.
Unfortunately, leadership is something that is not built in to the education of designers
whether it’s explicitly stated or whether it’s felt intuitively. I think we’ve all been in situations that
we’ve seen design as a profession that’s dominated by clientele. Unlike a lot of professions
like medicine, like attorneys, and academics, designers tend to do what our fee-paying clients
tell us to do. This is pretty widespread.>>Enoch: Well, what’s the alternative,
Lisa?>>Lisa: The alternative is that our profession…
The problem statement is that as a profession, not seeing oneself as a leader has consequences.
So, the alternative is to develop leadership as a profession, as individuals within the
profession, and hone those leadership skills. We need to find ourselves recognizing that
the preparation as a designer poises us for leadership. We’re already good at seeing
things in context. We’re already conversant in Arts, and Sciences, and Humanities. We
already see that environmental awareness is critical to the process of building buildings
and has a consequence in the future of the planet. Designers understand the limits of technology.
This is an issue that we’re poised to be leaders. We just have to take our place as
leaders in the community and take our place as leaders in businesses. I don’t mean just
designing on a drawing board, but we have to just get more involved in helping to lead
companies, and helping to direct our clients to solutions, and stand by them.>>Enoch: What does that look like? How can
architects be leaders and take leadership roles?>>Lisa: Again, being part of community leadership
programs, being part of generating policies not only within one’s community, but on
a national level. Policies that are related to… Anything with having to do with Health
and Safety, of course, we need to be in all conversations around Health and Safety. The
professions in our country that are really
impacting, that are really driving agendas on a global scale, are professions that are
developing policy. Architecture certainly has a voice in that. Design professionals
need to really be present and accounted for in policy discussions in the local community
and to understand that in the development, real estate development process, they are
not just responding to what the developers want. They need to be in the conversation
to impact what is being delivered to communities, the communities that we are going to be living
with for the next hundred and more years. So, I think stepping up and making oneself
a part of just your local community policy discussions. Zoning, certainly, that’s huge;
being part of conversations around the built environment’s impact on climate change.
These are areas where the design profession has such a role, and responsibility, and point
of view to take this in to… It’s just part of the duty of being a design professional.
I think it’s really an important aspect of being recognized as a leader.>>Enoch: Lisa, hopefully, we’ve inspired
some of our listeners to take leadership roles in whatever way that they feel that they’ve
driven towards. So, thank you for that.>>Lisa: I hope so. This is something that
is important to me and I would really like to see designers’ judgments not be subordinated
or determined by the wishes of a client who might not be as informed as the designer themselves.>>Enoch: Well, I know a lot of architects
feel that because the clients hold purse strings that their job and their duty are to do exactly
what the client wants.>>Lisa: Yeah, that’s a problem, but that
really isn’t the case. That really isn’t the case. I would challenge the designer to
resist that and to root their decisions, and their presentations on solutions, and valid
business thinking, and justification of those decisions on the basis of knowledge, and frames
design solutions in terms of that basis and knowledge. I think that’s part of it.>>Enoch: Do you have any suggestions, Lisa,
for tactfully presenting an alternate solution to a client as opposed to just, you know,
doing exactly what the clients want whether or not that’s right?>>Lisa: Yeah. I use an acronym. I invite
everyone to consider. The initials are VBR. It’s called VBR – Valid Business Rationale.
Honestly, I find that if you can root your solutions based on valid business rationale,
there isn’t a client that won’t get it. There isn’t a client that won’t get it. We talk about cost-saving. The costs of the
project today may be X, but over time, the incremental cost of a project, you know, pays
for itself. So, if improvements and high efficiency energy systems or higher performing materials
were used in a project, the valid business rationale for paying a higher cost today is
that these process or these products will last over time, and giving the reasons why
this system will save energy, why this particular layout and these materials will help generate
more healthy interiors to keep people healthy, and really get down to the research. The research to justify cost is out there.
I so often hear that “We can’t demonstrate improvements in productivity.” “We can’t
demonstrate this.” The fact is you can demonstrate it, but it takes research. I invite all of
us to be more rigorous about doing research and using it to quantify the solutions that
we come up with. It’s valid business rationale. It works every time.>>Enoch: Thank you, Lisa.>>Lisa: Sure.>>Enoch: Do you have any parting words for
our audience?>>Lisa: Well, I would just like to say that
we have an opportunity to make a difference in the world. A lot has been written about
our planet and our civilization, and that the 21st century is going to be a real determinant
of where we’re going to go. I don’t believe I’m overstating it, Enoch,
to say that our success will depend on designers becoming the organizing discipline of the
future. That will happen only when our professions become, our people become better leaders.
So, I wish everybody the best in that.>>Enoch: We need to do it. Thank you. Thank
you for being on the show, Lisa.>>Lisa: My pleasure. Glad to meet you and
all the best to your audience, Enoch.>>Enoch: Thank you very much. That’s a wrap for another show about the
Business of Architecture. To get more resources about how you, as an architect, can run a
rewarding business that is both fun, flexible, and profitable, visit www.BusinessOfArchitecture.com
and click the “Join” button to claim your free account to Business of Architecture Insider. As a member you’ll have access to free tools
and resources to help you get more clients, start a new firm, and much more. You’ll
also get access to my book Social Media for Architects where you’ll learn how to use
Internet tools for fun and for profit. Until next week, this has been the Business of Architecture.
[music]>>Enoch: The views expressed on the show
by my guests do not represent those of the host. I make no representation, promise, guarantee,
pledge, warranty, contract, bond, or commitment except to help you conquer the world. Bump
music credits to Ben Fold’s Five, “Do it Anyway.”


One thought on “Architecture Firm Succession Planning

  1. I have been a long time fan of your site and content since I am looking into transitioning in our own firm. An interesting follow-up piece you could look into doing is the case of Zaha Hadid and her sudden death and the impact it has or will have on her practice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *